Week 7 Assignment: Video Presentation
Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 150 Submitting a text entry box, a media recording, or a file upload
Now that you have completed your paper, you will build and deliver a video presentation that details your solution to your topic issue.
Videos can be recorded using any software or tool, but all videos are required to be uploaded to My Panopto Videos for assignment submission.
You can also use the Panopto Desktop Recording tool to create your video.
In your presentation, you should:
Exhibit comprehensive research and understanding by referencing important points and insights from the perspectives of inquiry papers.
Present your issue and your argument for your solution.
Demonstrate effective oral communication skills.
Develop a presentation to be shown simultaneously on screen while recording yourself via a webcam.
Exhibit competency in using virtual presentation tools and techniques.
Remain within the time requirement.
Demonstrate planning, preparation, and practice.
Employ effective visual elements (multimedia).
Make eye contact with the audience (the webcam).
Vary your tone of voice as appropriate, speaking clearly and loudly.
Your presentation should be 57 minutes in length. Refer to the rubric for evaluation details and to assist in preparing the presentation.
Points: 150
Due Sunday, 11: 59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Rubric
General Education Standardized Rubric: Week 7 Presentation
General Education Standardized Rubric: Week 7 Presentation
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
105 to >93.45 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Demonstrates original thought and critical thinking skills. Presents a clear, focused central argument and supports it effectively with concrete details, examples, and sound logic. Ideas are skillfully paraphrased and direct quotations are minimal and well-chosen.
93.45 to >75.6 pts
Meets Expectations
Presents and supports a clear and focused central argument, but ideas may not be consistently convincing. Supporting details are relevant and logical but may lack depth. Ideas are effectively paraphrased, and direct quotations are minimal.
75.6 to >61.95 pts
Approaches Expectations
Presents a central argument but may be overly general/broad. Supporting points may be vague, too obvious, or otherwise unconvincing. May struggle to express ideas or lack interesting details.
61.95 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Central argument is unclear or missing. Lacks focus. Supporting details are insufficient, not relevant, and/or not based on sound logic. Attempts to paraphrase do not reflect understanding.
105 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and Design
15 to >13.35 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Style, design, and media elements cleverly work together to convey the information in a logical, coherent, interesting, and easy-to-follow manner. Style and design choices enhance the message and are appropriate for the audience and/or content.
13.35 to >10.8 pts
Meets Expectations
Style, design, and media elements mostly work together to convey the information in a logical manner. Style and design choices mostly enhance the message and are appropriate for the audience and/or content.
10.8 to >8.85 pts
Approaches Expectations
Style, design, and media elements may not all work together to convey the information in a logical manner. Some style and design choices may detract from the message or are not appropriate for the audience and/or content.
8.85 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Style, design, and media elements do not work together to convey the information. Style and design choices detract from the message and are not appropriate for the audience and/or content.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAudio or Video Delivery
15 to >13.35 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Demonstrates careful and complete planning, preparation, and practiced execution. Speaker maintains good eye contact with the camera and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around). Speaker does not rely on notes nor slides Uses academic tone and language. Presentation is within the specified time constraints.
13.35 to >10.8 pts
Meets Expectations
Demonstrates some planning, preparation, and practiced execution. Speaker generally maintains good eye contact with the camera and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around) with only a few lapses. Speaker sometimes relies on reading notes and/or slides. Mostly uses academic tone and language. Presentation exceeds the specified time constraints.
10.8 to >8.85 pts
Approaches Expectations
Demonstrates little planning, preparation, and practiced execution. Speaker indicates little preparation through lack of eye contact and body language. Speaker reads mostly from notes and/or is not prepared. Some attempt at using academic tone and language. Presentation is less than the specified time constraints.
8.85 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Demonstrates no planning, preparation, or practiced execution. Speaker indicates no preparation through lack of eye contact and body language. Speaker reads exclusively from notes and/or slides and is not prepared; delivery is distracting and takes away from the content. Little to no attempt at using academic tone and language. Presentation is less than the specified time constraints.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources and APA Formatting
15 to >13.35 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Uses APA Style accurately and consistently to cite sources without errors. Meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment. The required number of relevant audience-appropriate sources have been expertly cited and integrated into the content to support ideas.
13.35 to >10.8 pts
Meets Expectations
APA Style is used with few citation errors. Meets most length and formatting requirements of the assignment. Reputable audience-appropriate sources have been included but may not be well integrated. The source content minimally supports ideas.
10.8 to >8.85 pts
Approaches Expectations
Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style with many errors. Meets few length and formatting requirements of the assignment. At least one source is used but is not cited properly, is not reputable, or is inappropriate for the audience or topic. The source does not support ideas.
8.85 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not use APA style; there are pervasive errors throughout the paper. Does not meet length or formatting requirements of the assignment. Sources are not provided.
15 pts
Total Points: 150
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|