Explain what makes your scholarly source an authority for your Wikipedia stub article subtopics.

• Explain what makes your scholarly source an authority for your Wikipedia stub article subtopics.
• Explain how the information from the article is relevant to your subtopics. Include specific information from the article that would demonstrate relevance.
• Discuss the overall strength of the article. Is it appropriate for your subtopics based on your evaluation? If your article is not appropriate, explain what your next step will be.
o Provide an APA Style-formatted reference for your scholarly source at the end of your post.
• Describe how using the selected reading strategy impacted your reading of your article, and what adjustments you might make to increase your efficiency in the future.
Section 2
Must be 150 words minimum and reference the following article: https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-a-confirmation-bias-2795024
• Describe a situation in which you or someone you know has demonstrated confirmation bias.
• Discuss two steps based on the assigned reading and video that could minimize the effect of bias in the situation you described.
• Explain why it is it important for scholars to be aware of confirmation bias during the research process. Include how this awareness is important to you as you seek informaticixon for your own research.

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered