How far should humans go to protect the environment?

Write an ethical essay using the Rogerian Model of argument in which you address the question, How far should humans go to protect the environment? following this outline and sources provided on the cited work:

Introduction
Both at the local and global levels, human populations have adopted evolving environmental strategies regarding depleting biodiversity. It is essential to acknowledge that humans are the pillar towards conserving the natural environment. Thus, the human species across the globe have witnessed challenging societal values relying on technology to mitigate environmental stress.

Thesis statement:
This paper aims at proposing significant human ethics, conservation science, and technological ideas towards sustaining the environment for future habitats.

Proposing argument
Martin et al. argue that conservation science has generated greener paradigms supporting fundamental shifts in values acknowledging the biophysical limits of the human population (6105). Although conservation science has been a transformational figure, technology has centered global values on biodiversity conservation amid environmental crises. According to (Martin et al.), the application of conservation science and economics provides better consonance for technology as part of ecological concerns (6108). Therefore, a sustainable economy on conservation science involves the use of renewable energy, clean infrastructure for a resilient future of the ecosystem. Through this innovation, the world has incorporated technological mechanisms to create peace and dignity in the environment.
Subsequently, conservation science advocates for the reconciliation of the daily activities governing our interaction with the environment. This involves the transformative actions on ethical values on conversing the environment that would secure the well-being of the people. Social science offers a platform for repairing and recognizing the environment. By definition, repairing the environment constitutes shifting values and worldviews towards fair and just approaches to the ecosystem. Thus, the human population must understand the limits of environmental functioning through the integration of social science. (Seymour 15), connotes that humans ultimate goal is to set and observe necessary precautions that help in disease prevention and the ecosystems health. Improper management of our natural resources could lead to adverse effects such as climate change.

Opposing Argument:
Arguably, there are negating opinions on environmental conservation. According to (Venier et al.), logging in the boreal cordilleran forests of Canada was an activity that sustained the livelihoods of the native occupant of that region (457). Logging is seen to intensify as people look for raw materials to manufacture varied wood products. Although this practice was widely practiced, one demerit was the consistent fire outbreaks that accompanied deforestation. As a result, (Venier et al.), argues that Timber dues are in some cases significantly reduced for salvage logging specifically in Manitoba, Ontario (458).

Bridging Argument:
For the ecosystem to sustain good life, the environment has to be kept in a reasonable condition whereby plants, human species, and animals are dependants on it.

Summary:
Therefore, humans are supposed to be the front liners in ensuring a healthy ecosystem that will sustain the current and coming generations. Conservation science, technology, and economics provide different perspectives that emphasize that the environment should be viewed as an essential asset in sustaining human lives.

Martin, Jean-Louis et al. The Need To Respect Nature And Its Limits Challenges Society And Conservation Science. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences, vol 113, no. 22, 2016, pp. 6105-6112. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences, doi:10.1073/pnas.1525003113.
Seymour, Valentine. The HumanNature Relationship And Its Impact On Health: A Critical Review. Frontiers In Public Health, vol 4, 2016, pp. 5-23. Frontiers Media SA, doi:10.3389/fpubh.2016.00260.
Venier, L.A. et al. Effects Of Natural Resource Development On The Terrestrial Biodiversity Of Canadian Boreal Forests. Environmental Reviews, vol 22, no. 4, 2014, pp. 457-490. Canadian Science Publishing, doi:10.1139/er-2013-0075.

Last Completed Projects