It has to be 180 words for discussion, 5 or 6 sentences for 2 discussions post and one respond for teacher question. All sources it should be from writing not outside sources. Discussion has to be APA 7 format. Consider two types moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches (and the specific theories involved).

It has to be 180 words for discussion, 5 or 6 sentences for 2 discussions post and one respond for teacher question. All sources it should be from writing not outside sources. Discussion has to be APA 7 format. Consider two types moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches (and the specific theories involved).

Which of these theories, if any, do you find most reasonable, and why?
Provide a clear example to demonstrate your thinking.
In responses to at least two peers, check their work. Were their explanations and examples clear and accurate? Identify any problems/errors in their logic or explain why you agree with their rationale. Make sure your responses are substantive and contribucixte extra to the discussion.

Last Completed Projects