Watch the 2 videos linked and answer these question in 2 pages.
VIDEO LINKS:
1. Are The Two Videos Above Convincing And/or Do They Contain Strong Proof of the Paranormal?–So just taking the two above videos standing on their own without any reference to the previous Nun videos, do these seem to be largely serious investigations into the paranormal? Do Danny and Felicity present any strong and convincing evidence of the existence of the paranormal or the events that befall them in the videos? Does anything appear to be faked or unbelievable in here? Would you believe these videos if you hadn’t seen anything else from Danny?
2.Can Exploring With Danny Be Trusted?–Here is the crux of the matter for Dr. Quack. Given that the Nun videos are obviously fake and strictly done for comedic and parody purposes, can anything that Danny is currently doing be trusted? Can you as viewers believe that Danny is now engaging in truthful investigations into the paranormal despite having previously done these fake videos? What is your opinion on this dilemma?
3.Why Did Danny Make The Change?–Another question that is plaguing Dr. Quack is why Dan Duffy would start out creating fake videos and then suddenly change over into a much more serious tone. Wouldn’t he be aware that many of his audience might have serious doubts about his credibility? Did Danny create these comedy videos to get his YouTube Channel attention and establish an audience, and once he did that then switch to the more serious investigations? Or is he simply doing something different and challenging his audience to find evidence that he is faking things in these much more advanced and complex videos?
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|