In thinking about all aspects of the simulation, including the content (i.e., the issue of Boko Haram in Nigeria and the Nigerian governments response to it) and the process (how our simulation proceeded), how many different aspects/concepts of what we’ve studied over the semester were present and where? You’ll want to take some time to think back through the whole course to see where the simulation provided parallels and examples of particular concepts or other events in current and historical international relations (or where it contradicted them). Be specific in the comparisons you draw (i.e., dont just say, for example, that parts of the simulation showed neorealismexplain how and where/when). A minimum of 6 substantive, analytical sources is required. You may certainly use newspaper, news magazine, encyclopedia articles and such, but they will not count as part of your 6 substantive sources. You need sources that are more analytical and in-depth than news articles. You should look for: books (or chapters in edited volumes), academic journal articles (e.g., Foreign Affairs, Terrorism and Political Violence, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, International Security, etc.), and analytical think tank pieces (e.g., Council on Foreign Relations; Brookings; CSIS, etc.)
– All papers must be typewritten and double-spaced, with no weird margins or bizarre fonts. (text only, not including reference list). There will be a one-grade penalty for being on either side of the word limit. Being able to make and argue your point concisely is crucial to effective writing.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|