Write a dissent (i.e. disagree with the Courts holding, arguing that the Court should have arrived at a different conclusion) to the Hernandez vs. Mesa (2020) U.S. Supreme Court case using a different method of legal interpretation. The Court’s opinion is mostly applying prudentialism and doctrinalism, so then you might apply originalism, structuralism, or precedentialism for understanding the law. You want to do what you can to make this argument persuasive: why should your reader side with your dissent over the Courts opinion?

Write a dissent (i.e. disagree with the Courts holding, arguing that the Court should have arrived at a different conclusion) to the Hernandez vs. Mesa (2020) U.S. Supreme Court case using a different method of legal interpretation. The Court’s opinion is mostly applying prudentialism and doctrinalism, so then you might apply originalism, structuralism, or precedentialism for understanding the law. You want to do what you can to make this argument persuasive: why should your reader side with your dissent over the Courts opinion?

Last Completed Projects