What is the justification for strict liability in product liability cases? Why are some courts critical of strict liability?

Please read chapters 11 & 12 of the book: “Tort Law, 6th Edition” (by J. Stanley Edwards). If you do not have access to this book, please use my credentials below to gain access. After reading, answer the prompt in detail while using the book as a scholarly source. Cite the book in Bluebook format.

Link: https://www.cengage.com

Prompt: Respond to the following five questions from the text:

Edwards: Chapter 11:

#7: Give examples of two activities that courts have classified as abnormally dangerous, and explain why they were considered to be so.

#8: Give examples of two activities that courts have classified as not being abnormally dangerous, and explain why they were not considered to be so.

Edwards: Chapter 12:

#9: What is the justification for strict liability in product liability cases? Why are some courts critical of strict liability?

#15: What defenses can be raised in a strict liability case?

Last question: Finally, you’ve had a number of readings this semester on ethical conduct for paralegals. Discuss the difference between ethical conduct and moral conduct for the Christian paralegal using at least one Bible citation to illustrate your thoughts.

Please cite the scholarly source in Bluebook format. Below is assistance on how to cite a book in Bluebook format ***Bluebook Resource:

Bluebook Resources

Last Completed Projects