What did you see? For a big case, in which you saw only part of the overall case, describe the part you saw (e.g., voir dire, a motion hearing, opening statements) and how it fit into the larger picture of the case.

For this assignment, you will need to please watch and analyze this court case: https://www.uscourts.gov/cameras-courts/hawk-technology-systems-llc-vs-brickell-financial-centre-llc

Very important to the professor to assess the proceeding and the general conclusions about law, the legal system, and the legal players that may be drawn from the particulars witnessed. Think about what you saw. Be willing to philosophize if that seems appropriate. Also, if the experience left you with questions, note them.

Some Points to Consider in The Report

1. What did you see? For a big case, in which you saw only part of the overall case, describe the part you saw (e.g., voir dire, a motion hearing, opening statements) and how it fit into the larger picture of the case.
2. The legal and factual problems in the case or cases.
3. The legal subjects (e.g., contracts, torts) relevant to the case(s).
4. For a case with a jury, the ramifications thereof (e.g., judge’s instructions, attorneys’ terms of persuasion).
5. How would you have handled the case as a juror, lawyer, or judge?
6. WHAT DID YOU LEARN?

In your report, please give sufficient information that a reader could find and view the proceeding, too.

The completed paper should be from 750 to 900 words, with that total not counting the citations, the footnoted materials, or any bibliography or title page.

Last Completed Projects