This paper is just a 3-page critique of the letter sent. The letter is on the second page of this PDF I have attached. Please Source only from the textbook I’ve attached (communicating for experts – Meyer – 5th edition). Please include the textbook page you cited from. At least 5 in-text citations.
The full instructions are listed below:
Using the analysis model provided below, write a critique of the document posted
– Your critique should point out what has been done effectively (including why this is effective), as well as what needs to be improved (or what is lacking).
There is no need to include each instance of effectiveness or error (i.e., each correct use of you-attitude
does not need to be itemized; each missing comma does not need to be noted).
– Each suggested improvement will be reinforced with a specific example of the improvement (write it out) and an appropriate textbook page number will be included to support the suggestion.
– An appropriate textbook page will support each instance of
effectiveness.
Your critique should address all aspects of the model; however, you should not simply answer each
question, as your writing will lack appropriate flow. The model provides you with a framework for your
critique (analysis) of the document; the questions should be considered as prompts for your critique of
the document. Your critique will include an effective introduction and conclusion, and headings will be
included to guide the reader.
RUBRIC:
There is no need to include a title page and no reference page is needed. Your critique will be no more than three pages, in
Calibri 11 point font, using single spacing or multiple 1.08 or 1.15 spacing, with 2.5 cm margins. You will include appropriately formatted headings and appropriate paragraph spacing (one
empty line between paragraphs remove any space after within the line spacing options) within the document (consider effective document design).
1) Purpose
Why is the message being delivered? What outcome or action is desired?
Did the writer demonstrate appropriate understanding of the messages purpose?
2) Audience
Who is the primary audience for the message? Who is the secondary audience?
What do you know about the audience(s)?
Did the writer demonstrate appropriate understanding of the messages audience?
3) Information
Is there sufficient information for the audience(s) to act?
o Completeness
Is there too much information? Does the message contain redundant information?
o Conciseness
Is the information clear, specific, and accurate?
o Clarity, concreteness, correctness
Is the information appropriate for the purpose and audience(s) identified?
4) Style and Tone
What is the style of the message? (Formal, informal, professional, etc.)
What is the tone (attitude) of the message? (Reader-centric, writer-centric, negative, etc.)
Are the style and tone consistent throughout the message?
Are the style and tone of the message appropriate for the purpose and audience(s) identified?
o Courtesy
Are reader benefit, you-attitude, and positive emphasis included in the message?
o Consideration
5) Design (including Format)
Does the document design increase the clarity of the message?
o Clarity (visual)
Are emphasis techniques used appropriately in the message?
Does the design help the reader to easily navigate the message?
Is the format appropriate for the purpose and audience(s)?
Are the format elements correctly presented? Are any format elements missing?
Writing Critique MGMT 3210-001/005/006/007 Fall 2021
6) Language and Organization
Is the language appropriate for the purpose and audience(s)?
o Clarity (verbal)
Is the grammar correct?
o Correctness
Are the sentence and paragraph structures appropriate for the purpose and audience(s)?
o Clarity (verbal) and coherence
Has the writer used the most appropriate organization plan for the audience and situation?
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|