Human security is the dog that didnt bark, in that its integration into the mainstream of policymaking has reinforced, rather than challenged, existing policy frame-works (Chandler, 2008: 248). Discuss.

Hello,

the essay should be derived from the essay planner that I have provided (attachment 1) in conjunction with the instructor feedback on this essay planner (attachment 2).

The title refers to a specific publication and other scholars who have responded to that critique, please use accordingly:

1) Chandler D. (2008). Human Security: The dog that didn’t bark. Security Dialogue Vol 39(4) pp. 427-438.
2) Owen T. (2008). The critique that doesnt bite: A Response to David Chandlers Human Security: The dog that didn’t bark. Security Dialogue Vol 39(4), pp. 445-453.
3) Wibben A. (2008). Human security: Toward an opening. Security Dialogue Vol 39(4), pp. 455-462.
4) Chandler D. (2008). Human Security II: Waiting for the tail to wag the dog – A rejoinder to Ambrosetti, Owen and Wibben. Security Dialogue Vol 39(4), pp. 463-469.

Also the instructor mentioned to use more state-centric literature, to my knowledge these include

1) Morgenthau, H. (1949) Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
2) Carr E.H. (1939/2001) The Twenty Years Crisis, Edited by Cox Michael, London: Palgrave.
3) Waltz K. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Kind regards

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered