Case Study: Chapters 7-10
Start Assignment
At the end of each chapter, there are Case Studies. Choose only one, read it, and answer all the questions that follow it in your own words. Please make sure you have each of the following:
Title page, 2 pages of content double-spaced with one-inch margins, and a reference page.
As this needs to format to APA Style, please visit for additional assistance:
Title Page, content: https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/paper-format (Links to an external site.)
Reference Page: https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/references (Links to an external site.)
No need to include the questions, as they are case study specific. It is suggested to indicate each question by including the number of the question ahead of your answer. Any questions included will not count towards the required two pages of content. Assume the reader knows the facts of the case; spend more of your content on your thoughts.
This one you choose from any from Chapters 7-10.
Review rubric for additional clarity.
Rubric
The Case Study Rubric
The Case Study Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Responses
How well the case study submission responses demonstrate critical thinking, reflect synthesis of information, provide value-added perspectives, and exhibit intellectual curiosity. Through the use of research, experiences, data or other experiential information, enhances the learning experience and leads to greater understanding.
50 pts
Clearly Demonstrates Critial Thinking, Intellectual Curiosity
Demonstrates critical thinking, intellectual curiosity, and provides in-depth responses; Evidence of necessary research leading to high quality responses and sources used are properly cited; Responds to all questions posed or topics of discussion with clarity and conciseness; Poses additional questions, relates to business environment/experiences/scenarios, and/or considers additional ideas or questions.
40 pts
Needs Improvement
Some criterion expectations met but not all, including: one or more responses lack in-depth thought, critical thinking or explanation; Perspective may not be original and/or may be a re-hash of author’s perspective; Not all cited material is properly credited and/or little supporting material used as necessary; Does not directly or adequately reply to questions posed or assignment topics that are the focus.
30 pts
Inadequate
Does not meet assignment and instructor expectations, including: Ambiguous or wandering responses; Little to no supporting information such as research, experience or data/information; Does not address questions or topics of assignment; Incorrect or no citations when required; Evidence of limited effort and reading of assignment; No attempt to improve or consider instructor suggestions for improvement.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assignment Structure
Meets requirements for assignment submission, structure including: min/max pages and other stated requirements.
20 pts
Meets All Requirements
Assignment meets all structure requirements including pages and others.
10 pts
Meets Most Requirements
Meets most structure requirements. May have one or two minor issues but they are not significant and it is obvious student attempted to meet requirements.
0 pts
Does Not Meet Requirements
Assignment does not meet one or more structure requirements and/or have multiple minor issues that, collectively, constitute major issues.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar, Spelling, Flow, Readability and Citations
Assignment has correct spelling and grammar, flows well leading to good readability, and has references properly cited (in-text and in reference list at end) in APA style, if required.
20 pts
Excellent Flow, Readability, and Citations
Little to no spelling or grammatical errors; Submission flows well and is easy to read; References are properly cited in APA format for both in-text citations and in the reference list at end.
10 pts
Acceptable Flow, Readability, and Citations
Has some spelling or grammar errors; Flow is slightly choppy or discontinuous, but still readable; Attempt to properly cite in APA style for both in-text citations and in the reference list, but may be minor error; May have missed an in-text citation, but included most; Could be improved.
0 pts
Unacceptable Flow, Readability and/or Citations
Multiple spelling and/or grammatical errors; Flow is choppy and hard to follow ; Readability is poor and discontinuous; Citations missing or not in proper APA style for either in-text citations or in the reference list at the end; Student did not improve or make corrections after prior comments or opportunity to correct issues.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Title Page / Reference Page
Meets all requirements for assignment comp
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|