For the short answer questions, the instruction will be to identify, define, and/or explain the significance of, a case name, term, concept, idea, or quote from a text. If you are asked to identify a quote, you should begin with the author and title of the case or reading from which the quote is taken. For these questions, you should write at least two paragraphs, and no more than three paragraphs. Paragraphs typically have 4-8 sentences. Identification questions are worth 10 points each, and will total 60 points out of 100 on the entire exam.

For the short answer questions, the instruction will be to identify, define, and/or explain the significance of, a case name, term, concept, idea, or quote from a text. If you are asked to identify a quote, you should begin with the author and title of the case or reading from which the quote is taken. For these questions, you should write at least two paragraphs, and no more than three paragraphs. Paragraphs typically have 4-8 sentences. Identification questions are worth 10 points each, and will total 60 points out of 100 on the entire exam.

1. Green v. County School Board (1968)
2. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Education (1971)
3. Milliken v. Bradley (1974)
4. Boston and busing (Eyes on the Prize Video); Judge Garritys remedy. WATCH>> * Eyes on the Prize, Boston and Busing. 1974-75, Total Running Time 57:00; Boston Segment Time: 0:00 to 31:00; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBhP4Py1xLM
5. Glazers three points about the Constitution, the federal courts, and school desegregation (Glazer, Chapter 3) (see page 94)
6. Equal Protection Analysis and strict scrutiny
7. the diversity rationale (Bakke)
8. City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. (1989)
9. Justice Kennedys controlling concurring opinion in Parents Involved in Community Schools
10. Palmer v. Thompson
11. Intent vs. impact approaches to racial discrimination
12. Griggs v. Duke Power Company (1971)
13. The Piscattaway Case.
14. qualifications, merit, and preferences, according to Amy Gutmann
15. Gutmanns view of the Piscataway case
16. Ricci v. DeStefano (2009) and the strong basis in evidence test
MUST USE ALL uploaded files as sources for the responses.

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered