Provide a reflection of the Narrative Paradigm. Clearly explain and define the theory, as well as its use as a rhetorical theory.
Explain the difference between the rational-world paradigm and the narrative paradigm. Why does Fisher believe this is a difference that truly makes a difference?
Which is a worse storya story that lacks coherence but has fidelity, or a story that lacks fidelity but has coherence?
Think of the movie you have seen most recently. Explain whether the movie possesses narrative rationality.
Both Fisher (storytelling animals) and Burke (rotten with perfection) attempt to define the essence of human nature. Compare and contrast their explanations of what it means to be human. Whose account do you find to have the most coherence and fidelity?
At times, the chapter stops short of claiming that all communication is story (e.g., see the first sentence of the last paragraph in the chapter). Do you think all communication is story? If yes, explain why; if no, provide an example of communication that is not a story.
-
Discuss how you would advise S&S Air about planning and growth in your own country and expansion into other countries?
-
Explain how shaving 5% off the estimated direct labor-hours in the base for the predetermined overhead rate usually results in a big boost in net operating income at the end of the fiscal year.
-
Write about South Africa’s withdrawal from the Commonwealth upon becoming a republic in 1961.
-
Explain how your experience coming from a low income household helped has shape who you are?
-
Write about union formation, labour strikes and collective bargaining as all three are related to the general theme/topic of trade unionism.
-
Identify the link between media and risk perception using a mix method of research having face to face interviews and sent out a questionnaire, the literature review is vital for success.
-
Explain the appearance of any damsels in distress, heroes, or romancewhat purpose does this element serve?
-
Discuss offenders focus of interests, the type of relationship he makes with the target (i.e., with the victim), the offenders thinking process in terms of what he uses to select the circumstances of the offense, the risks factored into the account (i.e., risks he accepts before committing those crimes).
-
What are some ways in which you can avoid these health problems by accurately responding to a stressful situation?
-
Provide your position on disaster diplomacy and if it can be applied to real-world situations. Is this a realistic concept or idealistic wishful thinking that, at best, produces only temporary, transitory benefits?
