End of Course Reflection

1. (LO 9) End-of-Course Reflection
Purpose: Reflect on your journey as a writer during the course of Composition II, considering what you have learned, and what skills you can apply in future written work.
Task:
Write a well-thought-out reflection about how you and your writing have evolved through the class. Ask yourself and answer the following questions to craft an essay of about 4 well-considered paragraphs.
How have your planning/drafting/writing strategies and critical thinking practices evolved this semester? What has worked well for you and what hasn’t?
What do you wish you had known when you began the course that you know now?
Look back at your feedback from your previous assignments. What feedback were you able to learn from and incorporate into your later writing and revision practices?
What skills, techniques, or ideas might you use from this course in future classes or other work?
Finally, what are you doing WELL? What’s working for you? What have you noticed in your writing? How are you improving?
This paper should employ first person (“I”) but still should communicate clearly and correctly, adhering to the conventions of written English.
Leave time to submit your draft to Free Tutoring at Tutor.com for review. Your tutor can help with thesis and content development, organization, grammar, and mechanics. Don’t forget that you can submit your draft to Tutor.com multiple times during the revision process!
Please refer to the Purdue Online Writing Lab for MLA formatting and style guide to appropriately format your first page.
Submit your final paper in the End of Course Reflection dropbox (under “Assignments”). Remember, your instructor will be able to see your Turnitin results – both your similarity percentage and any phrases or language that appear elsewhere, either online or in TurnItIn’s database of prior student work, so ensure that your work is scrupulous in its citations and adheres to the standards of academic honesty. No secondary sources are needed or encouraged. Plagiarism, as always, will not be tolerated. Please ask if you have any questions about citation or academic honesty.
File submissions: Please submit your file as a DOC.X or PDF file.
Grading Criteria:
The specificity and development of your metacognitive ideas
Your supporting claims, logic, and organization
The quality of your writing, to include paragraph development and organization: topic sentences, conclusions, transitions, etc.
Your thoughtfulness and insight as you answer the questions included
Length Requirement: 400-600 words
This activity may use a different grading rubric than what was used in past activities. Be sure to check the grading rubric before starting.

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered