Discuss critically explaining the roots of the debate over values in Quebec, the goal of a secular society in the light of Quebec history and your assessment of the claim that this Charter was simply a legitimate expression of the need to protect Quebec’s culture.

Topic: 1. “The Quebec Charter of Values and the bill 21 on religious symbols were both rooted in the Quebec nationalist opposition to Canadian federalism and the nationalists’ rejection of multiculturalism.” Discuss critically explaining the roots of the debate over values in Quebec, the goal of a secular society in the light of Quebec history and your assessment of the claim that this Charter was simply a legitimate expression of the need to protect Quebec’s culture. Has bill 96 reinforced this stance?
Format
9-10 pages (not including Bibliography and Presentation Page)
Double spaced
Pages numbered (except Presentation Page)
Times New Romance, 12
PDF
Content
Presentation Page
A classic presentation page (include your name, date of submission, class course, TITTLE OF YOUR PAPER (not POLI204 essay))
Bibliography
Your number of cited works should be at least equal to your number of pages, this is a rule in political science for this essay, a minimum of 9 sources
You also need to cite throughout your essay using whichever style you are comfortable with but in a consistent manner.
o You do not know these authors: do not call theme Steve or Donald or else. Use their last name.
Argument
The topics below ask you to explain an issue regarding Canadian politics and to put forward an argument. You need to make your argument clear in your introduction (1-2 sentences) and you need to explain how you will support your argument throughout your text.
To support your argument, you must rely on authors who have contributed to the literature around topic: those you agree with and those who you dont agree with. Explain to me why these authors are relevant to your argument.
Do not assume I know anything about your topic. You need to provide some background information (maximum 1 page) on your topic: why is it relevant to the field of Canadian politics?
No one is every objective in politics but be careful not to put your opinions at the forefront of everything: in other words, this is an argumentative paper and not an opinion piece.
Grammar
I will look at your overall grammar and vocabulary: please correct your spelling and watch out for typical mistakes

Last Completed Projects