Analyze and explain the results and draw your own conclusion to support or disconfirm

APA Format
At least 8 references (3 of which are peer reviewed)
Hypothesis: If a child experiences childhood trauma, then they will experience physical or mental effects as adults.

Paper discusses a question that can be solved
through investigation or review of current literature
(not original research).
States the question in the form of a hypothesis
List objectives for the research to address
Paper accurately describes the search process and
the analyzes research
Referenced resources are reviewed and evaluated
on their strengths and weaknesses based on the
“elements of believability and robustness”
Paper fairly describes areas of conflicting
views/results or investigations.
Paper describes gaps in existing literature and
suggests areas of possible future/expanded research
based off of gaps in the existing literature
Paper concludes by describing how the community
has been benefited/advanced by answering this
question.

Include in Paper:

Effects of Childhood Trauma in Adults scientific topic and analyze the case study with the following
necessary components labeled as sections on paper:

Introduction:
Hypothesis: If a child experiences childhood trauma, then they will experience physical or mental effects as adults.
Objectives: List objectives that will be addresses within literature review.

Results:
Synthesize and analytically summarize the information. How can we combine all of the various analyses from various sources into one cohesive story? You will have to develop the narrative for that story by organizing the various sources of information and then tracing the story through the sources. Find common variables between the sources. Example: Study 1 and Study 2 both focus on Alzheimer formation and produce the same results even though the methods are different. Analysis in this section will be about organizing and synthesizing the information, and finding a precise thread that can be traced through the information.
Evaluate information: Review and evaluate at least 3 reference sources on their strengths and weakness. Argue why you are designating a particular strength or weakness and criteria being used to state this.
Conflict information: Describe areas of conflicting views or methods. Are there conflicting methods or results between these various sources of information?

Discussion:
Analyze and explain the results and draw your own conclusion to support or disconfirm
Given the information in the results section draw a clear conclusion in support of confirmation or disconfirmation of the hypothesis
Provide particular reasons for conclusion
What information is the confirmation or disconfirmation based on

Gaps in information:
Discuss gaps and suggest areas of possible future research based off of gaps encountered
Suggest new methods and approaches to closing the gaps. What can scientist do to support? New methodologies can they explore? Can a randomized experimental experiment be created.

Conclude: Describe the benefits, advancements

Last Completed Projects