Explain whether you think the speaker used this appeal in a convincing and effective manner or not.

Textbook: *Lunsford, Andrea, et al., editors. Everyones an Author with Readings. 3rd ed., W. W. Norton, 2020.*

https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/debate/dont-bring-extinct-creatures-back-life/#/ — The transcript for the video debate is available at this link.

For this video debate, please write four annotations according to these instructions:

Start one conversation thread of your own by answering one of the questions listed below.

Here are options for starting your own conversation:

— Find an example of the rhetorical appeal ethos (as discussed in Chapter 18) and explain whether you think the speaker used this appeal in a convincing and effective manner or not. Are you persuaded by the idea? Why? Why not?

— Find an example of the rhetorical appeal pathos (as discussed in Chapter 18) and explain whether you think the speaker used this appeal in a convincing and effective manner or not. Are you persuaded by the idea? Why? Why not?

–Find an example of the rhetorical appeal logos (as discussed in Chapter 18) and explain whether you think the speaker used this appeal in a convincing and effective manner or not. Are you persuaded by the idea? Why? Why not?

— Ask a question about something one of the speakers said

— Answer any of the stasis questions on page 420 of Chapter 18 by highlighting a part of the reading that helps you to answer the question and by typing in your ideas as a comment:

What are the facts?

How can the issue be defined?

How much does the issue matter, and why?

What actions should be taken as a result?

Here are options for replying to your classmates:

Agree with an idea of your classmate but EXPLAIN WHY YOU AGREE

Disagree with an Idea of your classmate but EXPLAIN WHY YOU DISAGREE

Ask your classmate a question about their comments.

Extend and elaborate on an idea of your classmate with some more of your own thoughts and/or personal experiences.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

For Tom Philpott’s article, please write four annotations according to these instructions:

Start one conversation thread of your own by answering one of the questions listed below.
Reply to one of your classmate’s conversations by typing @ and then selecting the classmate’s name and typing your thoughts about what your classmate wrote
Reply to a second classmate by typing @ and selecting the classmate’s name
Reply to a third classmate by typing @ and selecting the classmate’s name

Here are options for starting your own conversation:

— Answer any of the stasis questions on page 420 of Chapter 18 by highlighting a part of the reading that helps you to answer the question and by typing in your ideas as a comment:

What are the facts?

How can the issue be defined?

How much does the issue matter, and why?

What actions should be taken as a result?

OR

Answer any of the questions at the end of the reading by highlighting a part of the reading that helps you to answer the question and by typing in your ideas as a comment. You can find these by scrolling to the end of Philpott’s article.

Here are options for replying to your classmates:

Agree with an idea of your classmate but EXPLAIN WHY YOU AGREE

Disagree with an Idea of your classmate but EXPLAIN WHY YOU DISAGREE

Ask your classmate a question about their comments.

Extend and elaborate on an idea of your classmate with some more of your own thoughts and/or personal experiences

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered