Issue: Military family stress and PTSD
How common is it for children to experience this kind of trauma?
Are there specific effects that result from this kind of childhood trauma?
What kinds of behaviors do children who have undergone this kind of trauma demonstrate?
Give at least one example of an intervention that is based in science and has been used to address the issues found in children as a result of the trauma. Briefly discuss the overall results from this intervention.
Criteria
Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
Did Not Attempt
Criterion Score
Content
40 points
The papers content discussed all 4 questions. The discussion demonstrated how each area was linked to the others.
The topic was well developed and expanded upon in the body of the paper.
The conclusion includes a restatement of the main ideas that were supported with prior evidence, and a closing statement that demonstrates the importance of the topic and brings a sense of closure to the reader.
34 points
The papers content discussed all 4 questions. The discussion demonstrated how each area was linked to the others but there may have been gaps in some of the content. The conclusion presented a summary of the main points and/or concise reflection on the topic.
30 points
The papers content addressed only 3 of the 4 questions. The paper may have needed more development and detail. There was an attempt at a conclusion.
26 points
The papers content addressed less than 3 of the question areas. There may have been gaps in content. The conclusion may be missing.
0 points
Did not attempt, or the content was presented in an unclear or unsatisfactory manner.
Score of Content,/ 40
Support from a Scholarly Source
15 points
Three scholarly and/or peer reviewed sources were used in total with appropriate in-text citations and end of paper reference list. No errors or minimal errors.
12.75 points
Three authoritative references sources were used, with at least two sources being scholarly and/or peer reviewed with appropriate in-text citations and end of paper reference list. Several minor errors may be evident.
11.25 points
Two authoritative references sources were used, with at least one source being scholarly and/or peer reviewed with appropriate in-text citations and end of paper reference list. Some errors may be evident.
9.75 points
One reference source was used, with appropriate in-text citations. There may be some errors evident.
0 points
No attempt or no support for writing from any sources.
Score of Support from a Scholarly Source,/ 15
Academic Writing Format – APA
10 points
The paper was presented professionally and had appropriate APA
format with: cover page, font/size, alignment, running head, abstract, entire paper double spaced, reference page with references listed in alphabetical order per APA.
8.5 points
The paper was presented professionally but had 1 of the following Apa elements missing or with a few minor errors: cover page, appropriate font/size, alignment, running head, abstract, entire paper double spaced, reference page with references listed in alphabetical order per APA.
7.5 points
The paper was presented with mostly appropriate APA format but 2-3 of the following APA elements were missing or had errors : cover page, appropriate font/size, alignment, running head, abstract, entire paper double spaced, reference page with references listed in alphabetical order per APA.
6.5 points
The paper was presented with 4 or more APA elements missing or with errors: cover page, font/size, alignment, running head, abstract, entire paper double spaced, reference page with references listed in alphabetical order per APA.
0 points
No attempt or the paper has no or very minimal APA format
Score of Academic Writing Format – APA,/ 10
Depth and Detail
15 points
The papers ideas were presented in a clear and succinct manner. The body of the paper met the 1000 word minimum (excluding the abstract/end reference list) but did not exceed 1400 words.
12.75 points
The papers ideas were presented in a clear manner. The paper achieved within 20% of the required word minimum (excluding the abstract/ end reference list.) The paper was at least 800 words but not more than 1600 words.
11.25 points
The papers ideas were presently in an easily understood manner. The paper did not achieve the minimum requirement but was within 40% of 1000 words. The paper was at least 600 words but no more than 1800.
9.75 points
The papers ideas were presented in an easily understood manner. The paper did not achieve minimum requirement. The paper was more than 40% short of 1000 words, over or under. The paper was less than 600 words or more than 2000 words.
0 points
No attempt made or insufficient depth and detail.
Score of Depth and Detail,/ 15
English Stylistics, grammar, spelling, punctuation
20 points
The paper was written in an essay format (not Q & A) and contained no or minimal errors in stylistics, grammar, spelling and punctuation.
17 points
The paper was written in an essay format (not Q & A) and contained a few errors which did not significantly detract from the content.
15 points
The paper was written in an essay format (not Q & A) but contained multiple errors which detracted from the content.
13 points
The paper was not written in an essay format and/or contained significant errors. The paper was not at college level expectations with regard to stylistics, grammar, spelling, punctuation.
0 points
Minimal attempt with very significant errors that detracted from the content. OR No attempt made.
Score of English Stylistics, grammar, spelling, punctuation,/ 20
Total
Score of CHFD415 Assignments Week 2 & Week 7,/ 100
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
