NO OUTSIDE SOURCES!
In describing the defenses put forth in favor of Dyers action at Amritsar the author of our assigned article, Derek Sayer, points to a trend where India is represented as a different moral universe What is Sayer arguing here?
To answer this question, consider how the humiliating acts imposed by Dyer and others are presented as moral, or serving a moral and practical purpose?
Consider Dyers own words in defending his acts at Amritsar, and how represented his acts as moral.
Why does Sayer claim that the assertion that was a singular instance and not representative of Britain ring hollow (clue p.159-160)?
What do your answers to all the above questions tell about the nature of imperial rule, whether in India or elsewhere?
Please use distinct paragraphs to organize your answers to each of these questions and your final reflections on the nature of 19th century imperial rule.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|