DESCRIBE HOW YOU DEVELOPED A PICO(T) QUESTION FOCUSED ON YOUR CHOSEN CLINICAL ISSUE OF INTEREST.

IN THIS ASSIGNMENT, YOU WILL DELVE DEEPER INTO CLINICAL INQUIRY BY CLOSELY EXAMINING YOUR PICO(T) QUESTION. YOU ALSO BEGIN TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE YOU HAVE COLLECTED.
TO PREPARE:
(A) REVIEW THE RESOURCES AND IDENTIFY A CLINICAL ISSUE OF INTEREST THAT CAN FORM THE BASIS OF A CLINICAL INQUIRY.
(B) DEVELOP A PICO(T) QUESTION TO ADDRESS THE CLINICAL ISSUE OF INTEREST YOU IDENTIFY IN MODULE 2, i.e. order #658521 for the assignment. THIS PICOT QUESTION will remain the same for the entire COURSE.
(C) USE THE KEYWORDS FROM THE PICO(T) QUESTION YOU DEVELOPED AND SEARCH AT LEAST FOUR DIFFERENT DATABASES IN WALDEN LIBRARY. IDENTIFY AT LEAST FOUR RELEVANT SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OR OTHER FILTERED HIGH-LEVEL EVIDENCE, WHICH INCLUDES META-ANALYSES, CRITICALLY-APPRAISED TOPICS (EVIDENCE SYNTHESES), CRITICALLY-APPRAISED INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES (ARTICLE SYNOPSES). THIS EVIDENCE WILL NOT NECESSARILY ADDRESS ALL THE ELEMENTS OF YOUR PICO(T) QUESTION, SO SELECT THE MOST IMPORTANT CONCEPTS TO SEARCH AND FIND THE BEST EVIDENCE AVAILABLE.
(D) REFLECT ON THE PROCESS OF CREATING A PICO(T) QUESTION AND SEARCHING FOR PEER-REVIEWED RESEARCH.
THE ASSIGNMENT: (EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT)
(A) CREATE a 6-to 7-slide POWERPOINT PRESENTATION IN WHICH YOU DO THE FOLLOWING:
(1) IDENTIFY AND BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR CHOSEN CLINICAL ISSUE OF INTEREST.
(2)DESCRIBE HOW YOU DEVELOPED A PICO(T) QUESTION FOCUSED ON YOUR CHOSEN CLINICAL ISSUE OF INTEREST.
(3) IDENTIFY THE FOUR RESEARCH DATABASES THAT YOU USED TO CONDUCT YOUR SEARCH FOR THE PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES YOU SELECTED.
(4) PROVIDE APA CITATION OF THE FOUR PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES AT THE SYSTEMATIC-REVIEWS LEVELS RELATED TO YOUR RESEARCH QUESTION. IF THERE ARE NO SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ARTICLES ON YOUR TOPIC, THEN USE THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF EVIDENCE PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE.
(5) DESCRIBE THE LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN EACH OF THE FOUR PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES YOU SELECTED, INCLUDING AN EXPLANATION OF THE STRENGTHS OF USING SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH. BE SPECIFIC AND PROVIDE EXAMPLES.
(6) ENSURE THE PRESENTATION PROVIDES A COMPLETE, DETAILED, AND ACCURATE SYNTHESIS OF TWO OUTSIDE RESOURCES RELATED TO THE PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES SELECTED, AND FULLY INTEGRATES AT LEAST TWO OUTSIDE RESOURCES, AND TWO OR THREE COURSE-SPECIFIC RESOURCES THAT FULLY SUPPORT THE PRESENTATION.
(7) PROVIDE A CLEAR AND COMPREHENSIVE DESCRIPTIVE PURPOSE STATEMENT, INTRODUCTION, AND CONCLUSION WHICH DELINEATES ALL REQUIRED CRITERIA.

Last Completed Projects