In your own words, paraphrase the positions defended and the arguments made by Antonin Scalia and David Strauss. Which of them makes the most convincing defense of the proper method to interpret the Constitution? How do you think political ideology relates to the debates about Constitutional interpretation?
Good answers will clearly state what each theory/argument entails.
I prefer that you not use outside sources, but, if you do, cite them parenthetically.
Also, the work cited page should be the 4th page while the paper is 3 pages. Total page number will be 4 including work cited.
No spelling and/or grammar mistakes. Please proofread.
Written in such a way that clear paragraphs contribute to the overall flow of the argument that you want to make.
The paper demonstrates that the writer fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.
The paper is focused such that the steps of the argument are laid out in each paragraph. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by statement of a position or hypothesis.
The paper ties together information from all sources. Paper flows
from one issue to the next. The writer demonstrates an understanding of the relationship between the ideas discussed in the paper.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|