Summarize the main points, highlighting key ideas, phrases, words, etc. The summary should be no more than one third of your total response, but it should sufficiently indicate the important points of the article.

Two articles will be reviewed two pages each
Directions
our first article should address any of the first three course objectives. Your second article should address any course objectives 4, 5, or 6. Each review should be about two pages in length.

Article Review Format (You MUST follow this format)
Please label each of the three parts using APA level headings (e.g., Bibliographical Information, Content Summary, Response).
1. Bibliographical Information
Using APA format, cite the article you are reviewing.
2. Content Summary
Summarize the main points, highlighting key ideas, phrases, words, etc. The summary should be no more than one third of your total response, but it should sufficiently indicate the important points of the article.
3. Response to Journal Article
4. Reflect on and react to the article. Some sample questions to consider: Does it make sense to you? Do you agree with the authors position? Why or why not? What stood out for you? What do you think you can use as a curriculum worker? How can you apply this piece to your school context/situation (current or future)? What is your overall evaluation of the piece? Do you have anything else to add?

Topics for articles
1) Visualize the importance of and the processes involved in curriculum implementation.
2) Demonstrate a comprehension of the nature and purpose of curriculum evaluation.
3) Compare and contrast the scientific evaluation models with the humanistic evaluation models. 4) Develop a working knowledge of curriculum evaluation practices and the various roles played in curriculum evaluation.
5) Demonstrate that they have contemplated contemporary philosophical, social, cultural, and political issues in curriculum.

Last Completed Projects