Analyze one of the three conspiracy narratives from Tacitus (Germanicus; Fire; Pisonian Conspiracy) using either Popper, Hofstadter, Keeley, Clarke, Coady, or Basham (pick one). [I picked Coady]
Since you are responsible for only one conspiracy and only one theoretical/critical lens, you should be able to delve into more detail. As always, support your ideas with evidence from the texts. If you discuss the story of Germanicus, feel free to use the Senatus Consultum de Gn. Pisone Patre. The rubric asks that you demonstrate critical thinking, so be sure that you are making connections between the ancient sources (Tacitus and/or the inscription) and the modern philosophical readings.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
