Explain and respond to Karkkainen’s statement, “Approaching the topic of the Spirit and pneumatology from the perspective of experience is the only way to do justice to the ‘object’ of our study.”

Review Textbook: Flame of Love: A Theology of the Holy Spirit, Textbook: Pneumatology: The Holy Spirit in Ecumenical, International, and Contextual Perspective, 1.1b PowerPoint: Overview of Contemporary Approaches to Pneumatology, 1.1c PowerPoint: Introductory Lecture on Doctrine of the Spirit.
Review Karkkainen Ch. 1: Introduction to Pneumatology as a Theological Discipline, and Pinnock Introduction.
For your initial post, respond to the following:
From Pinnock:
Respond to Pinnock’s discussion regarding the way we should speak of the Spirit (viz., which pronoun best fits with our understanding and why).
From Karkkainen:
Explain and respond to Karkkainen’s statement, “Approaching the topic of the Spirit and pneumatology from the perspective of experience is the only way to do justice to the ‘object’ of our study.”
Why does Karkkainen refer to the Spirit as the “Cinderella of Theology?”
What are the contemporary approaches to the study of the Spirit, according to Karkk

Last Completed Projects