Which three (3) of the conflicts would you share and how would you describe them to your family or friends?

This movie is about the housing crisis to assist in giving a big picture view of what was happening with all the different components: Financial Institutions, Government, Investors, and Borrowers.

1) So lets just say when you were talking to family or friends about how excited you were about watching the movie “Too Big To Fail” How would you share/explain the importance of watching the movie?

2) In that same conversation as question #1, Which three (3) of the conflicts would you share and how would you describe them to your family or friends?

3) On the question “To Big To Fail”, Should the U.S. Government break the banks up into smaller entities? Why or Why Not? Explain.

4) On the question “Too Big To Fail” and being we use a capitalistic approach to business, Should biggest financial institutions be allowed to make as much revenue and profit as they want with little oversight from the U.S. Government? Why or Why not? Explain.

5) In this movie “Too Big To Fail” your given a bigger view (although probably a bit dramatized lol) of the financial institution’s company values, thought processes, and collaboration with each other and the government.
Please state your agreement or disagreement and explain why you agree or disagree for EACH statement below:
A) The financial institutions understood the magnitude of the crisis
B) The financial institutions understood that it was their practices that created the situation?
C) The financial institutions cared and felt remorseful about the situation

6) Choose a Pro side or Con side and write your 100 word introductory argument for the chosen side:
“Should the U.S. Government had let the financial institutions fail instead of giving them a cash infusion?”

Last Completed Projects