Foundational Theories of Human Development Paper

Review this unit’s readings, and include specific information with citation within your written response as appropriate.

Write a (3-page paper (excluding APA title page and reference pages) comparing Freud, Mahler, Adler, and Erikson. Compare and contrast the developmental models of Freud and Erikson, and then compare and contrast the developmental theories of Adler and Mahler. Are there any similarities between all of them? Be sure to also address the following:

Compare and Contrast Freud & Erikson
Compare and Contrast Adler & Mahler
Similarities of all listed above
There should be
A brief description of each theory. Which perspective appeals to you more, and why?
What are some ways the Adlerian approach can be applied to group counseling? What are some advantages of using a group format with this approach?
What concepts from these psychoanalytic approaches do you see as being potentially useful in your work as a nurse psychotherapist? Describe why.
Why should the nurse psychotherapist understand developmental theories for application in clinical practice?
You should cite a minimum of three APA references.

Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.

Rubric
NU672 Unit 2 Assignment – Foundational Theories of Human Development Paper Rubric
NU672 Unit 2 Assignment – Foundational Theories of Human Development Paper Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent of Paper
30 pts
Exemplary – Exceeds Expectations
The writer demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner. The paper content and theories are well developed and linked to the paper requirements and practical experience. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper. Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials. All instruction requirements noted.
26 pts
Advanced – Meets Expectations
The writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter, and components of the paper are accurately represented with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Course materials and scholarly resources support required concepts. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper. Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. All instruction requirements noted.
23 pts
Intermediate – Needs Improvement
The writer demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter as evidenced by components of the paper being summarized with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development. Course content is present but missing depth and or development. Does not follow the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Only uses scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials. Most instruction requirements are noted.
20 pts
Novice – Inadequate
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Use of course content is superficial. Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation. Content of paper is inaccurately portrayed or missing. Does not follow the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Does not use scholarly resources. Missing some instruction requirements.
0 pts
Not Proficient
Assignment not completed.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Synthesis of Paper Content and Meaning
30 pts
Exemplary – Exceeds Expectations
Through critical analysis, the submitted paper provides an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content. Information from scholarly resources is synthesized, providing new information or insight related to the context of the assignment by providing both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints. All instruction requirements noted.
26 pts
Advanced – Meets Expectations
Paper is complete, providing evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources. Information is synthesized to help fulfill paper requirements. The content supports at least one viewpoint. All instruction requirements noted.
23 pts
Intermediate – Needs Improvement
Paper lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference supports the content without adding any new information or insight. The papers content may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete. Most instruction requirements are noted.
20 pts
Novice – Inadequate
Submission is primarily a summation of the assignment w

Last Completed Projects