Length: 5-7 pages (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double-spaced pages
12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Arial font
Headings & subheadings
In-text citations
Title page
References page
Standard English usage and mechanics
Revisions based on course faculty feedback from Week 5 AssignmentW7 Assignment Grading Rubric
W7 Assignment Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
Requirements:
1. Introduce the practice problem.
2. Discuss sources of research evidence selected in Weeks 3, 4, and 5.
20 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent introduction.
18 pts
Includes all requirements with a very good introduction.
16 pts
Includes all requirements with a basic introduction.
0 pts
Poor introduction and/or includes 1 or fewer requirements.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of the Practice Problem
Requirements:
1. Present the significance of the practice problem.
2. Present the prevalence of the practice problem.
20 pts
Includes all requirements and an provides an excellent analysis of the practice problem and prevalence.
18 pts
Includes all requirements and a very good analysis of the practice problem and prevalence.
16 pts
Includes all requirements with a basic analysis of the practice problem and prevalence.
0 pts
Includes 1 or fewer requirements and/or with a poor analysis of the practice problem or prevalence.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence Synthesis
Requirements:
1. Present main themes, and salient findings that emerge from the sources (Cited).
2. Compare and Contrast the main points from all sources (Cited).
3. Present an objective overarching discussion of evidence about the practice problem and prevalence.
50 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent evidence synthesis.
45 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a very good evidence synthesis.
40 pts
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements with a basic evidence synthesis.
0 pts
Includes 1 or fewer requirements and/or provides a poor evidence synthesis.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppraise the Evidence
Requirements:
1. Level of evidence.
2. Quality rating of evidence.
3. Appraise and support the suitability of the evidence to address the practice problem.
20 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent appraisal of the evidence.
18 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a very good appraisal of the evidence.
16 pts
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements and provides a basic appraisal of the evidence.
0 pts
Includes 1 or fewer requirements and/or provides a poor appraisal of the evidence.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelection of a Translation Theory or Model
Requirements:
1. Present the components of the theory.
2. Discuss how stakeholders are integrated into the design of the theory or model.
50 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent discussion of translation model and/or stakeholders integration into theory model.
45 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a very good discussion of the translation model and/or how stakeholders integration into the theory model.
40 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a basic discussion of translation model and/or how stakeholders integration into theory model.
0 pts
Includes 1 or fewer requirements and/or provides a poor presentation of components of translation theory and how stakeholders are integrated into the theory model.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
Requirements:
In one concise paragraph, provide a clear and logical conclusion that summarizes the paper.
10 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent conclusion.
9 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a very good conclusion.
8 pts
Includes all requirements and/or provides a basic conclusion.
0 pts
Provides a poor conclusion.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRevisions
Requirements:
Revisions done based on course faculty feedback from Week 5 Assignment .
50 pts
Substantial revisions have been made based on course faculty feedback on the week 5 paper.
0 pts
Limited or no revisions have been made based on faculty feedback on the week 5 paper.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary Table
Requirements:
1. Two quantitative research studies
2. One qualitative research studies
3. Complete all sections completely and identify the quality and the levels of evidence.
15 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent summary table.
13 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a very good summary table.
12 pts
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements or a basic summary table.
0 pts
Includes no requirements or a poorly completed summary table.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppendix A
Requirements:
Attach the completed Johns Hopkins Summary Tool as Appendix A.
10 pts
Includes tool in the appendix.
0 pts
Does not include the tool in the appendix.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Standards
Requirements:
1. Use appropriate Level I headers.
2. Reference and citations are in current APA style.
3. Paper length is 5-7 pages excluding title, reference pages, and appendix.
10 pts
Includes all requirements and presents excellent APA style and standards.
9 pts
Includes 3 requirements and very good APA style and standards.
8 pts
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements of APA style and standards.
0 pts
Includes 1 or fewer requirements of APA style and standards.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Writing
Requirements:
1. Use standard English grammar and sentence structure.
2. No spelling or typographical errors.
3. Organized presentation of ideas.
20 pts
Includes all requirements and demonstrates excellent clarity of writing.
18 pts
Includes all requirements and demonstrates very good clarity of writing.
16 pts
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements and/or demonstrates basic clarity of writing.
0 pts
Includes 1 or fewer requirements and/or demonstrates poor clarity of writing.
20 pts
Total Points: 275
3 three articles below”
Amos, R., Morris, L., Mansell, W., & Edge, D. (2019). Clients’ experiences of one‐to‐one low‐intensity interventions for common mental health problems: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology and Psychotherapy, 92(4), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12200
Carlsson I, Blomqvist M, Jormfeldt H. Ethical and methodological issues in qualitative studies involving people with severe and persistent mental illness such as schizophrenia and other psychotic conditions: a critical review. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being. 2017; 12:1-10.
Tran, T. T. T., Nguyen, N. B., Luong, M. A., Bui, T. H. A., Phan, T. D., Ngo, T. H. & Nguyen, T. Q. (2019). Stress, anxiety, and depression in clinical nurses in Vietnam: a cross-sectional survey and cluster analysis. International Journal of Mental Healcixth Systems, 13(1), 1-11. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13033-018-0257-4
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|