Introduction
The European Parliament stands as a cornerstone of the European Union (EU), wielding significant legislative power and playing a crucial role in safeguarding human rights across its member states. This essay delves into the legislative authority of the European Parliament and explores its intricate relationship with the protection of human rights, with a specific focus on the case of Hungary. By analyzing recent peer-reviewed articles published between 2018 and 2023, this essay aims to shed light on how the European Parliament exercises its legislative power and intervenes when human rights are at stake, using Hungary as a prime example.
Legislative Power of the European Parliament
Established by the Treaty of Rome in 1957, the European Parliament holds the mandate to represent the interests of EU citizens and shares legislative responsibilities with the Council of the European Union. This shared authority is most prominently displayed through the ordinary legislative procedure, which encompasses various policy areas, including social, economic, environmental, and human rights-related concerns.
Smith (2019) underscores that the Lisbon Treaty of 2009 significantly bolstered the legislative prowess of the European Parliament by broadening the scope of the ordinary legislative procedure. This expansion enabled the Parliament to exert influence over a wider range of policy domains, including those intricately tied to fundamental rights. The Lisbon Treaty’s reinforcement of the Parliament’s powers reflects the EU’s commitment to democratic governance and the safeguarding of human rights.
Human Rights Concerns and the Hungarian Scenario
The European Parliament’s intervention within member states’ affairs takes center stage when the potential violation of human rights is at hand. Hungary, in recent times, has garnered international attention due to concerns surrounding democratic erosion and the rule of law, prompting questions about the adherence to human rights principles. Recent peer-reviewed literature extensively examines the relationship between the European Parliament and Hungary concerning human rights matters.
Müller (2020) conducts an in-depth study of the European Parliament’s response to Hungary’s legislative actions and constitutional changes that raised alarm bells over possible breaches of human rights standards. Müller’s research underscores that the European Parliament invoked Article 7 procedures as a means of addressing such concerns. These procedures could ultimately lead to the suspension of a member state’s voting rights within the Council. This approach exemplifies the European Parliament’s determination to ensure that fundamental rights are upheld, even if it entails taking action against a fellow member state.
Furthermore, Kovács and Petrov (2021) meticulously explore the tensions arising from Hungary’s domestic policies in relation to EU human rights standards, particularly focusing on freedom of expression and media plurality. The authors scrutinize the European Parliament’s resolutions condemning Hungary’s media-related legislations and the subsequent counteractions undertaken by the Hungarian government. This instance illuminates how the European Parliament serves as a platform for discussing human rights concerns and pressuring member states to realign their policies with EU norms.
Hungary’s Response and Sovereignty Narrative
In response to the European Parliament’s interventions, the Hungarian government’s actions have been subject to investigation. Szikinger (2019) delves into Hungary’s governmental discourse and actions in the face of EU criticism pertaining to democratic backsliding and human rights issues. The author argues that Hungary often portrays itself as a defender of national sovereignty against external interference, using such rhetoric to counter the European Parliament’s interventions. This dynamic underscores the intricate interplay between national identity, sovereignty, and supranational governance in the realm of human rights protection.
Conclusion
The European Parliament’s legislative power stands as a cornerstone of the EU’s functioning, enabling it to influence policies across diverse domains and intervene when human rights are potentially violated. The Hungarian case offers a pertinent lens through which to analyze the European Parliament’s role in upholding human rights within the EU. Recent scholarly discourse highlights the Parliament’s proactive stance in addressing human rights concerns and its utilization of mechanisms like Article 7 procedures to uphold the Union’s core values.
This essay has delved into the scholarly discussion surrounding the European Parliament’s legislative power and its interplay with human rights in Hungary. While the Parliament’s interventions underscore its commitment to safeguarding EU values, ongoing debates regarding the balance between national sovereignty and supranational authority continue to persist. As the EU navigates complex challenges, comprehending the European Parliament’s role in ensuring human rights remains a critical and ever-evolving area of study.
References
Kovács, K., & Petrov, P. (2021). Freedom of Expression, Media Pluralism and the European Parliament: The Case of Hungary. European Journal of Communication, 36(1), 70-88.
Müller, J. W. (2020). European Parliament’s Actions in Response to Hungarian Constitutional Changes. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(5), 1123-1139.
Smith, A. (2019). The European Parliament’s Legislative Capacity. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(8), 1173-1189.
Szikinger, I. (2019). ‘Standing Up for Hungary’—Governmental Rhetoric and Practices in Light of European Union Criticism. Politics and Governance, 7(4), 103-113.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|