Skim over the EIS for the Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion: https://www.mvn.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/Permits/Mid-Barataria-Sediment-Diversion-EIS/
a) What does NEPA require in-terms of decision making for this project? Does NEPA propose the environmental requirements, or just set-out the process?
b) What office of the executive branch administers NEPA and its application in different agencies?
c) Who is the lead agency? What other agencies are involved?
d) Regarding the long-term governance of NEPA, to what extent do you think climate change should be included in coastal restoration project evaluation? Can you identify it in this ESA?
a) Which office oversees cost-benefit analysis and regulatory impact analysis within the federal government? ( https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/information-regulatory-affairs/regulatory-matters/#eo12866).
Is it the same as the one which oversees NEPA?
b) Read-over the Brooking’s report on the dispute regarding the use of co-benefits in regulatory impact analysis: A co-benefit in this context is a co-benefit as a favorable impact of [a] rule that is typically unrelated or secondary to the statutory purpose of the rulemaking.
c) Which approach you would you advise the Biden Administration to adopt
please answer all questions, writer the question exactly the way I sent you and bold it before the answers
please answer all question
see the attachment
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
