Week 6 Signature Assignment: Culminating Argument
Due Feb 19 by 11:59pm Points 150 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
The Signature Assignment paper is a culminating argument paper that includes the four perspectives of inquiry presented in the first two papers with the addition of an abstract, an introduction, and a conclusion. The content from the perspective papers submitted in Weeks 3 and 4 should be revised based on instructor feedback for inclusion in this assignment.
This paper should include a newly composed introductory section and a new final conclusion section that presents your discussion of, and argument for, the solution. Your argument, or rationale, for the solution that you propose is the focus of this paper.
The final paper requirements include:
Total of 1520 pages in length
Title page (1 page)
Abstract (1 page; abstracts appear on separate pages)
Introduction (12 pages)
Reworked informative perspective papers (1015 pages)
Conclusion (12 pages)
References (12 pages)
Reference 1215 scholarly, peer-reviewed resources published from within the last five years (compiled by combining all of the references from your Perspective of Inquiry papers and any additional resources you use in this final paper)
Follow all APA Style formatting guidelines
Refer to the rubric for evaluation details and to assist in preparing the paper.
Points: 150
Due Sunday, 11: 59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Rubric
General Education Standardized Rubric: Week 6 Culminating Argument
General Education Standardized Rubric: Week 6 Culminating Argument
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
75 to >66.75 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Demonstrates original thought and critical thinking skills. Presents a clear, focused central argument and supports it effectively with concrete details, examples, and sound logic. Ideas are skillfully paraphrased and direct quotations are minimal and well-chosen.
66.75 to >54.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Presents and supports a clear and focused central argument, but ideas may not be consistently convincing. Supporting details are relevant and logical but may lack depth. Ideas are effectively paraphrased, and direct quotations are minimal.
54 to >44.25 pts
Approaches Expectations
Presents a central argument but may be overly general/broad. Supporting points may be vague, too obvious, or otherwise unconvincing. May struggle to express ideas or lack interesting details.
44.25 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Central argument is unclear or missing. Lacks focus. Supporting details are insufficient, not relevant, and/or not based on sound logic. Attempts to paraphrase do not reflect understanding.
75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication
45 to >40.05 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Assignment shows strong, insightful evidence of the synthesis and application of the ideas and concepts.
40.05 to >32.4 pts
Meets Expectations
Assignment shows some evidence of the synthesis and application of the ideas and concepts.
32.4 to >26.55 pts
Approaches Expectations
Assignment shows little evidence of the synthesis and application of the ideas and concepts.
26.55 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Assignment shows no evidence of the synthesis and application of the ideas and concepts.
45 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics
15 to >13.35 pts
Exceeds Expectations
The writing demonstrates sophisticated clarity and conciseness and is extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct with minimal to no errors.
13.35 to >10.8 pts
Meets Expectations
The writing is clear, concise, and well organized. May contain a few punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors.
10.8 to >8.85 pts
Approaches Expectations
The writing lacks clarity, conciseness, or organization. Several errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.
8.85 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The writing is unfocused and poorly organized. Many errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources and APA Formatting
15 to >13.35 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Uses APA Style accurately and consistently to cite sources without errors. Meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment. The required number of relevant audience-appropriate sources have been expertly cited and integrated into the content to support ideas.
13.35 to >10.8 pts
Meets Expectations
APA Style is used with few citation errors. Meets most length and formatting requirements of the assignment. Reputable audience-appropriate sources have been included but may not be well integrated. The source content minimally supports ideas.
10.8 to >8.85 pts
Approaches Expectations
Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style with many errors. Meets few length and formatting requirements of the assignment. At least one source is used but is not cited properly, is not reputable, or is inappropriate for the audience or topic. The source does not support ideas.
8.85 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not use APA style; there are pervasive errors throughout the paper. Does not meet length or formatting requirements of the assignment. Sources are not provided.
15 pts
Total Points: 150
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|