Question 1. Uniformity of food regulations (including definitions, procedures, protocols, sanctions, penalties) is important to the food industry so that marketing of food articles throughout the United States’ markets can be consistent and free from different regulations. Should there be one (1) set of food regulations for the entire United States (states, territories, tribes) that presents consistency to the food industry? (Point Value: 5 points)
If your answer is yes, (that there should be one set of regulations) your answer shall include:
— A description of what agency/agencies would oversee the one set of food regulations;
— What set of food regulations would be the basis of the food regulations?
— What advantages would the one set of food regulations provide to the food industry and to consumers?
— What disadvantages would the one set of food regulations provide to the food industry and to consumers?
If your answer is no, (that there should not be one set of regulations) your answer shall include:
— What advantages exist for the food industry and for consumers from the current system of separate federal regulatory authorities and states regulatory authorities (even though these two authorities cooperate and collaborate)?
— What disadvantages exist for the food industry and for consumers from the current system of separate federal regulatory authorities and states regulatory authorities (even though these two authorities cooperate and collaborate)?
Question 2. Section 18.2 (State Inspection and Enforcement Powers) illustrates several procedures/protocols by which the states regulatory authorities can act in ways that the federal regulators cannot. If the states regulators can act in ways that the federal authorities cannot, should there be a change in either one of these regulatory authorities so that there is uniformity of the two regulatory authorities? Why or why not? (Point Value: 5 points)
please use FDA as the source
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|